Your message dated Wed, 5 Jan 2000 01:14:56 +0100 (MET)
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line fixed in glibc-2.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Dec 1998 09:55:11 +0000
Received: (qmail 11100 invoked from network); 11 Dec 1998 09:55:06 -0000
Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  by master.debian.org with SMTP; 11 Dec 1998 09:55:06 -0000
Received: from bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [130.149.19.1])
        by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id KAA17142
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 11 Dec 1998 10:54:12 +0100 (MET)
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
        by bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.1/8.9.0) id KAA03964;
        Fri, 11 Dec 1998 10:54:11 +0100 (MET)
From: Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Fri, 11 Dec 1998 10:54:11 +0100 (MET)
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: FD_ZERO macro
X-Mailer: VM 6.43 under 20.4 "Emerald" XEmacs  Lucid
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Package: libc6-dev
Version: 2.0.7u-7.1

with the egcc-ss package, egcc complains about the FD_ZERO macro. For
a patch please see /usr/doc/g++/FAQ.gz. Not sure if it needs to be
applied to both files:

/usr/include/asm/posix_types.h
/usr/include/selectbits.h
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 30609-done) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Jan 2000 00:15:46 +0000
Received: (qmail 30356 invoked from network); 5 Jan 2000 00:15:38 -0000
Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  by master.debian.org with SMTP; 5 Jan 2000 00:15:38 -0000
Received: from bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [130.149.19.1])
        by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3/8.9.1) with ESMTP id BAA08366
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 5 Jan 2000 01:14:57 +0100 (MET)
From: Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
        by bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) id BAA16738
        for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 5 Jan 2000 01:14:56 +0100 (MET)
Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2000 01:14:56 +0100 (MET)
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: fixed in glibc-2.1

oops, this was fixed with glibc-2.1. Why wasn't it closed?

Reply via email to