Your message dated Wed, 5 Jan 2000 01:13:14 +0100 (MET)
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line fixed with newer gpc
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Nov 1998 20:36:01 +0000
Received: (qmail 893 invoked from network); 25 Nov 1998 20:35:54 -0000
Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
by master.debian.org with SMTP; 25 Nov 1998 20:35:54 -0000
Received: from bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [130.149.19.1])
by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id VAA21935
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 25 Nov 1998 21:32:17 +0100 (MET)
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.1/8.9.0) id VAA29337;
Wed, 25 Nov 1998 21:32:10 +0100 (MET)
From: Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 1998 21:32:09 +0100 (MET)
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Debian-CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: gpc doesn't work with libc6-2.0.7u-5
X-Mailer: VM 6.43 under 20.4 "Emerald" XEmacs Lucid
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Package: libc6
Version: 2.0.7u-5
Sorry, that I am not more specific ... When building gpc (part of
Debian egcs package) on a system with libc6-2.0.7u-5 and binutils
2.9.1.0.15-2.1, I get 101 test failures in the pascal test
suite. Building the package on a libc6-2.0.7t-1 and binutils 2.9.1-0.2
system, only 6 tests fail. I don't append the log of the gpc
testsuite. You can find it in /usr/doc/gpc/gpc-test-summary.gz of
gpc-2.91.58-5. Perhaps Peter (gpc developer) can append more
information on this topic. The failures are many gpc parser errors.
Any hint, what changed between these versions would be welcome.
Not sure, if this could be a binutils bug as well.
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 30002-done) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Jan 2000 00:15:34 +0000
Received: (qmail 30151 invoked from network); 5 Jan 2000 00:15:32 -0000
Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
by master.debian.org with SMTP; 5 Jan 2000 00:15:32 -0000
Received: from bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [130.149.19.1])
by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3/8.9.1) with ESMTP id BAA08246
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 5 Jan 2000 01:13:15 +0100 (MET)
From: Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) id BAA16732
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 5 Jan 2000 01:13:14 +0100 (MET)
Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2000 01:13:14 +0100 (MET)
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: fixed with newer gpc
I cannot reproduce this with newer gpc's in potato.
