Il 26/06/2016 12:37, Richard Duivenvoorde ha scritto: > I think the QGIS project handles the Qt4 removal good enough: QGIS > misses some functionality (not used by me personally), and notably some > plugins, but for most there is a way around it. > > Instead of OpenLayers plugin for example, one can use the > QuickMapServices plugin! > > osEarth I do not use to be honest. > > But my take to Bas: please keep packaging LTR/2.14 even it misses some > functions. I think 2.14 is currently the best choice. > > And 2.16 would be ok too if users prefer that as an upgrade, but if > packaging (in combi with osEarth) is a problem: let's just wait for 3.0 > for the next packaging upgrade. > > QGIS 2.16/Qt5 builds are too experimental. > > AFTER 2.16 there will be a full focus on Qt5/Python3. > > 2.14 'just works' 99% of the functions. The OpenLayers issue is actually > a plugin issue and only for Debian testing users and out of the projects > responsibility. We have sometimes too many masters to serve :-( > > And also from my side: a big thanks for all the work you do and have > done for FOSS GIS and QGIS and Debian!
Hi all, I fully agree with Richard, and support his view. All the best. -- Paolo Cavallini - www.faunalia.eu QGIS & PostGIS courses: http://www.faunalia.eu/training.html
