As discussed in the recent bugreport [0], I'm considering removing qgis from Debian because we cannot even support 2.14 LTR in the next stable release.
Removing qgis from Debian is not in the interest of our users, one of our core values in Debian. This puts us distribution developers between a rock and a hard place. QGIS upstream does not manage transitions in their dependencies, leaving the upstream QGIS packages uninstallable after GDAL transitions. Only the qgis packages in Debian get rebuilt for those transitions. For the sake of my sanity I don't want to deal with the bullshit from QGIS upstream any more. The promise to deal with osgEarth 2.7 compatibility and QtWebKit removal have turned out to empty. QGIS 2.14 LTR is still broken in Debian testing & unstable. We're now forced to adopt the 2.16 non-LTR for its improved Qt5 support to not have these bugs in the next stable release. I'm very unhappy being forced into that suboptimal solution. I'm coming to the conclusion that we cannot support qgis in Debian stable releases, and should remove it from Debian to acknowledge that. This will make a lot of users unhappy, so I'm not fond of that either. By forcing users to rely on the upstream QGIS packages, their number may have sufficient weight to force the QGIS developers to deal with transitions in their Debian packages. What do you think we should do with QGIS in Debian? [0] https://bugs.debian.org/828031 Kind Regards, Bas -- GPG Key ID: 4096R/6750F10AE88D4AF1 Fingerprint: 8182 DE41 7056 408D 6146 50D1 6750 F10A E88D 4AF1
