On 03/17/2015 04:19 PM, Jochen Topf wrote: > On Di, Mär 17, 2015 at 03:28:33 +0100, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: >> On 03/17/2015 03:17 PM, Jochen Topf wrote: >>> Working my way through the packages... I wonder if the osmcoastline-doc >>> package >>> is really needed. OSMCoastline is a set of command line tools and its use is >>> documented in manpages included in the osmcoastline package. The >>> osmcoastline-doc package contains the Doxygen-generated sourcecode >>> documentation which is only useful for somebody working on osmcoastline >>> source. >>> And because the documentation in the source code is lacking even that >>> documentation isn't that useful. I think we can live without that package, >>> it >>> will only confuse users of the command line tools who might think they get >>> some >>> use out of it. >> >> The case for dropping the osmcoastline-doc package seems pretty clear. >> Please go ahead if you'd like to make these changes. > > Done.
Thanks. Since the only architecture independent binary package is no longer included, the build-indep target is now obsolete. I just pushed a change to remove it. Kind Regards, Bas -- GPG Key ID: 4096R/6750F10AE88D4AF1 Fingerprint: 8182 DE41 7056 408D 6146 50D1 6750 F10A E88D 4AF1 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: https://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
