On Di, Mär 17, 2015 at 03:28:33 +0100, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: > On 03/17/2015 03:17 PM, Jochen Topf wrote: > > Working my way through the packages... I wonder if the osmcoastline-doc > > package > > is really needed. OSMCoastline is a set of command line tools and its use is > > documented in manpages included in the osmcoastline package. The > > osmcoastline-doc package contains the Doxygen-generated sourcecode > > documentation which is only useful for somebody working on osmcoastline > > source. > > And because the documentation in the source code is lacking even that > > documentation isn't that useful. I think we can live without that package, > > it > > will only confuse users of the command line tools who might think they get > > some > > use out of it. > > The case for dropping the osmcoastline-doc package seems pretty clear. > Please go ahead if you'd like to make these changes.
Done. > Regarding the man pages I was a little disappointed that I had to create > the man pages instead of using the man pages built from the upstream > source like osmium-tool. > > Please consider including man pages in OSMCoastline itself so we can > drop this Debian specific change. I'll look into it. Jochen -- Jochen Topf [email protected] http://www.jochentopf.com/ +49-173-7019282 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: https://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
