Florian Weimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 19/07/2003 (11:23) : > Preben Randhol <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > What do you mean? That it is a bad idea at the moment as nothing is > > stable or that it is a bad idea whenever? I don't agree with the > > latter. > > What do you propose? Upstream is still at the beginning of shared > library support. They use rpath and have a very unusual versioning > scheme (ldconfig complains about it). Upstream obviously doesn't > expect that people move dynamically linked executables from one > machine to the other.
I see I didn't know it wasn't supported yet. So when shared library support is in place in gcc 3.x or 4.x, then one can have shared libraries? What I was trying to say is that I hope one can eventually have shared libraries so my Ada applications compiled with gcc does not become 3 times bigger as they are with Gnat 3.14p or 3.15p. But it sounded like somebody thought this was a bad idea at any time. As for the debian package the symlinks should be removed so that one doesn't get confused about why the so libs are missing. Preben -- Ada95 is good for you. http://www.crystalcode.com/codemage/MainMenu/Coding/Ada/IntroducingAda.php
