Preben Randhol <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > What do you mean? That it is a bad idea at the moment as nothing is > stable or that it is a bad idea whenever? I don't agree with the > latter.
What do you propose? Upstream is still at the beginning of shared library support. They use rpath and have a very unusual versioning scheme (ldconfig complains about it). Upstream obviously doesn't expect that people move dynamically linked executables from one machine to the other.
