On Wed, June 8, 2005 13:23, Martin Schulze wrote: >> So soldiers can do both good and evil, see no intrinsic problem with >> them per se. > > You can't get one without the other.
It's not realistic to assume that no-one has soldiers. Even if you are peaceful yourself, some evil entity will have less problem with using force; you can then insist on still not using force to defend yourself but you will be assimilated by the other party in no-time then. Your position to never use soldiers doesn't work in a world where not everyone shares that position. Anyway, this argument is not really on topic here, and if it appearently offends some people to have soldiers on the cover, it's not a good choice, even if there are other people who don't mind. If you can appease more people with a different cover, it makes sense to do that. Thijs -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
