Eduard Bloch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> - Should i use the normal Installsystem or PGI ? > I personally prefer the normal installation system, but I am not > objective.
Hehe, you are on of the bf-guys, yes. >> - Should i make only an Image for one CD or for more (woody is >> biiiiiig) > IMO yes. We should merge packages list of the last lt-CD, merge with > Knoppix list and drop non-free and knoppix-specific packages. There must be emacs on the CD. A Linux-CD without Emacs is a Windows-CD. And Postfix and pppoe. Anything else does not matter. :) >> - Should i make a DVD Image ? (i dont have a DVD Burner, so i cant >> test that) > What about price of the copies? I dont know. I dont copy them, i just create the iso. >> - I will use bf2.4, no 2.2.x Kernel. > I suggest to put bf2.4 and bf2.4-xfs on a (isolinux) multiboot CD. Is there a reason to not only use bf2.4-xfs ? You dont need to install XFS if you dont want ? Or is that a must with -xfs ? >> - Who will test them (i put them on people.d.o). > IMO bad idea, ppl.d.o has too slow for big downloads. Give me a better server. My home DSL Line with 128kb Upstream is not a good thing :) -- begin OjE-ist-scheisse.txt bye, Joerg Registered Linux User #97793 @ http://counter.li.org end -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
