On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 3:01 AM, Andreas Tille <andr...@an3as.eu> wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 01, 2011 at 04:54:49PM +0100, José L. Redrejo Rodríguez wrote: > > El mar, 01-03-2011 a las 15:56 +0100, Holger Levsen escribió: > > > each time I see "openteacher" I'm thinking I wouldn't like a very > simple and > > > limited tool being called like I am. I'm not a teacher, but I think the > name > > > is unfortunate. > > > > > > maybe it's just me... > > > > Not only you, I've thought exactly the same the first time I saw the > > RFS. > What's the issue with the name? > > So is there anyone (=any teacher) who volunteers to contact upstream > (possibly proxied through the maintainer who RFSed the package) about > this? I'm quite new to the whole process so if someone could just point me in the right direction(if there is a formal method of submitting an RFP) and explain to me what's the issue. -- Arvind S Raj
