Konstantinos Margaritis wrote: > To cut the long story short, I agree with Steve's proposal on this: > > arm-linux-gnueabi_hf
What is the purpose of the underscore? In other words, what is the advantage over arm-linux-gnueabihf? I worry that some tools may not like it --- for example, package names like mlton-target-arm-linux-gnueabi_hf are not allowed. Which looks very much surmountable, but just in case, it seems prudent to ask. Just to be clear, this is not an objection (both triplets look fine to me). I ask in the hope of getting the rationale well documented. Thanks, Jonathan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-dpkg-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110314084711.GA23600@elie
