On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 09:43:41AM +0100, Guillem Jover wrote: > On Sun, 2011-02-20 at 23:38:36 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 07:32:19AM +0100, Guillem Jover wrote: > > > Given the above we'd need to either switch to i586-linux-gnu or > > > i386-linux-gnu, it seems to me both will imply the same amount of > > > changes? And thus going for the latter seems the correct solution, > > > it matches with the other architectures, can be used as the multiarch > > > paths and can reduce some divergence with Ubuntu, all of them a clear > > > win! :)
> > Why i586 for the multiarch path? That's an arbitrary baseline, based on > > what Debian is currently targeting. How do I sell that to the LSB and to > > other distributions, most of which AIUI now use i686 as their least common > > denominator? > Hmm probably didn't express myself correctly. I'm proposing to go > for i386-linux-gnu as the GNU triplet for both for Debian and > Ubuntu (well, any derivatives for that matter), which for at least > the paths is also neutral for everyone else (LSB, etc). Oops - reading failure on my part, sorry. But then I guess the converse problem is, what software makes assumptions about the difference between i386-linux-gnu and i486-linux-gnu that will hurt us? > > > I'd say any such assumption in those packages is buggy, per above. > > Yep, software is buggy. We should be careful not to design a system that > > fails because it requires software to not be buggy. :) > Well, and buggy software should be fixed, right? :) Yes, but it makes me nervous that fixing such software might be on the critical path for multiarch. > Anyway I don't see how using i386-linux-gnu would make the system fail, at > least for the path part, for the autotools part at most it might make few > packages not choose better optimizations/primitives? Maybe, but considering some of the features lacking in i386, that could be a pretty severe regression, causing the system to fail the "fit for purpose" test. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. Ubuntu Developer http://www.debian.org/ slanga...@ubuntu.com vor...@debian.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
