>>>>> "Richard" == Richard Braakman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Richard> On Mon, Mar 27, 2000 at 11:55:49AM -0600, Manoj Richard> Srivastava wrote: >> This should not be a RC bug: bbdb works just fine for >> emacs19/20, and even the basic package continues to work for >> XEmacs (for VM users, for example). Only the interface between >> bbdb and gnus in _one_ of the flavours of emacs is broken; does >> it justify yanking bbdb despite the fact it works for a large >> number of people? Richard> That depends on what happens. Does the install process Richard> fail because xemacs20 happens to be installed? Actually, for me (the original bug submitter), it works on one computer (with xemacs20 and xemacs21 installed, I only use xemacs20), but doesn't work on another computer (with xemacs20 installed). I set the severity to important, as I feel that bbdb support is important for gnus, and also, because I think it should be easy to fix (if you know what you are doing --- I don't). The error message doesn't make sense. I will quote it here: xemacs20 -batch -q -no-site-file -eval "` dir=\". \"; echo \(setq load-path \(append \(list ; for i in $dir ; do echo \\"$i\\"\ ; done ; echo \) load-path\)\) ; `" -l ./bbdb.elc -eval '(if (not (string-match "/usr/share/xemacs20/site-lisp/../lisp/gnus" "")) (setq load-path (cons "/usr/share/xemacs20/site-lisp/../lisp/gnus" load-path)))' \ -f batch-byte-compile bbdb-gnus.el Compiling /usr/share/emacs/site-lisp/bbdb/lisp/bbdb-gnus.el... While compiling toplevel forms in file /usr/share/emacs/site-lisp/bbdb/lisp/bbdb-gnus.el: !! File error (("Cannot open load file" "gnus")) Done Can't find gnus????? But I use gnus all the time!!!!! I am using it right now! I do not understand the logic that sets the load-path, it is possible that might be wrong. I manually compiled the bbdb-gnus file, but still couldn't use bbdb from Gnus, so I am hoping this doesn't indicate another problem. However, nobody has even tried to contact me... (I haven't checked the BTS though, so somebody may have sent a message there, and failed to send me a CC). I can provide more details, if you tell me what I should check. I don't think it is worth dropping the package though. -- Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>