On Fri, 17 Sep 1999, Brian Mays wrote: > Perhaps we should keep the last two versions of each branch? In this > case, 2.0.35, 2.0.36, 2.2.10, and 2.2.12 (which is in Incoming). I > don't know. Let's see whether anyone objects to just keeping two > versions around. That seems reasonable. Once the 2.0.x kernels finally are obsoleted, there may be three 2.2.x kernels. Bj"orn Brill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Frankfurt am Main, Germany
- Too many kernels in unstable Brian Mays
- Re: Too many kernels in unstable Guy Maor
- Re: Too many kernels in unstable Brian Mays
- Re: Too many kernels in unstable Josip Rodin
- Re: Too many kernels in unstable John Lapeyre
- Re: Too many kernels in unstable Brian Mays
- Re: Too many kernels in unstable Bjoern Brill
- Re: Too many kernels in unstable Hartmut Koptein
- Re: Too many kernels in unstable Edward Betts
- Re: Too many kernels in unstable Joseph Carter
- Re: Too many kernels in unstable Ivan E. Moore II
- Re: Too many kernels in unstable Roland Rosenfeld
- Re: Too many kernels in unstable Herbert Xu
- Re: Too many kernels in unstable Roland Rosenfeld
- Re: Too many kernels in unstable Hirling Endre
- Re: Too many kernels in unstable John Lapeyre
- Re: Too many kernels in unstable Hirling Endre