Guy Maor wrote: > What about just keeping the last 2.0.x and the last 2.2.x ?
I agree. One 2.0.x, one 2.2.x, eventually one 2.[34].x version. This has been discussed before, people agreed that there's too much of the kernel packages in there. You're the FTP admin, please act. Brian Mays wrote: > That would be fine by me; however, some people might object because > kernel "improvements" sometimes break things -- even in stable kernel > branches. It is not so rare for someone to avoid upgrading to the next > kernel version, because it breaks some obscure feature that he needs. That's not a reason enough for keeping >20MB stuff for every version of kernel, IMNSHO. If there is a problem, you can still downgrade to your old kernel image. Which you did preserve, didn't you[1]? Plus, all of those versions are kept on ftp.kernel.org for indefinite time. And you can file a bug to the BTS, too. [1] "you" doesn't refer to you personally, Brian. -- enJoy -*/\*- don't even try to pronounce my first name
