On Wed, 20 Jan 1999, Ben Collins wrote: > Ok, after looking at this, I've decided that the cracklib support for > PAM would be best handled by having it in a seperate package. I want to > propose a naming scheme for module packages for PAM similar to how > apache modules are named, libpam-mod-foo, where foo is the module name. > Using this scheme the cracklib PAM module package will be named > libpam-mod-cracklib, and this package will contain the Depends for > cracklib.
Sounds fine to me. Will there be a pam-base that all these module packages depend on ? > NOTE: This naming scheme will reuire the ppp-pam package to be renamed, > any problems with this? Why? Isn' this simply ppp with pam support? -- Jean Pierre
