On Tue, Jun 23, 1998 at 11:39:31AM +0200, Santiago Vila Doncel wrote: > Is anybody able to do a brief summary, please? If "emacs" is abolished as > a virtual package name, what is the point in forbidding a package to name > itself as emacs?
Because we cannot banish it for all time past. Hamish -- Hamish Moffatt, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Latest Debian packages at ftp://ftp.rising.com.au/pub/hamish. PGP#EFA6B9D5 CCs of replies from mailing lists are welcome. http://hamish.home.ml.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
