-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- On 21 Jun 1998, Mark W. Eichin wrote:
> Perhaps you could review the discussion 6 months ago (or more!) when > we first concluded that this was the *only* way it would work... Is anybody able to do a brief summary, please? If "emacs" is abolished as a virtual package name, what is the point in forbidding a package to name itself as emacs? > Users *will* get somewhat confused. Then again, that's because they > don't read the release notes, or perhaps don't run autoup which I > think handles this gracefully. Users should not be forced to use any particular upgrade method. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.6.3ia Charset: latin1 iQCVAgUBNY93oSqK7IlOjMLFAQFc9AP+ILrYcHwP+N0LLzkEA8ReV/I1VHbtuKmJ +Zj2pdZ5LC5OJ4/s2F1zb6Qi5kRoQTHqzJ9V6UYTE3Z/Qi2d/x+gcgpqf1zJAtaH S8To9zN5ME4lmM1b5iTrOtGScQ7smFm0G3plH+XdBt1lCVtxhXhG11p2Iy4Ir73o IqRQyQze6/o= =YXSb -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
