-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- On Tue, 23 Jun 1998, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 22, 1998 at 11:54:05AM -0400, Dale Scheetz wrote: > > In both these examples the "cludge" only hangs around for a while, while > > the epoch gets stuck on the version forever. > > Is it really that bad? You said you don't want the clutter of it but > I can't really see how there is much clutter. I find Santiago's > suggestion of a manual upgrade absurd. It may be true that forcing our users to upgrade by hand one day before the beta release day, once that hamm is in "deep freeze mode", and once that lots of people have already installed hamm is a great inconvenience for many of them and a bad idea, but it would not be the first time we tell our users to upgrade a package "by hand" (remember the upgrade from Debian 1.2 to 1.3?). So the issue about being "absurd" or not would be relative, not absolute. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.6.3ia Charset: latin1 iQCVAgUBNY90HCqK7IlOjMLFAQFpKgP7BaV8lbBqBUICCNsLCYxGHxlG93CWSyOJ 57IvvumGv6RwR565sRHxJpMA38DZGfyTenGtU9HQj0VjrvoQnk0J80xSONkTCTwF UYLiAsgx6+sR9/PPf5TRRziofwJBeMwp+ozksT0bHeqVmTeIFCeolMLScfbuDYuB ZYYnkDAyJjU= =PCNn -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
