Dale Scheetz writes: > > > I like Santiago's suggestion better: > > > > > > 2.0.8pre1 => 2.0.7.99.1 > > > 2.0.8pre2 => 2.0.7.99.2 > > > : > > > 2.0.8 => 2.0.8 > > > > > > Which scales properly and solves the problem. > > > > Mmm, well, this was actually suggested by Vincent Renardias, but yes, I > > also like this proposal :-). I used a similar approach for procmail and > > smartlist (only similar, because I don't have a "99"), with a > > clarification about the version number in the extended description.
Well, it is know solution, but with a disavantage: we don't use upstream version number... -- Yann Dirson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | Stop making M$-Bill richer & richer, isp-email: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | support Debian GNU/Linux: debian-email: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | more powerful, more stable ! http://www.mygale.org/~ydirson/ | Check <http://www.debian.org/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
