-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- On Tue, 16 Jun 1998, Andreas Jellinghaus wrote:
> > Well, but putting them in a hamm package does not prevent people using bo > > to download that package (it's a "binary-all" package, isn't it?) and use > > it. Moreover, people can use the bug tracking system to report bugs. > > I don't think a package is such a wrong place. > > some people don't use dpkg, don't use debian, and still will burn a cdrom for > a friend. a tar.gz is much better ... Please, note that I'm not saying that these scripts should be distributed *just* as a .deb package. I'm saying that they should probably be distributed as a .deb package *in addition* to any other form of distributing them. I don't want to discuss "what is better". -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.6.3ia Charset: latin1 iQCVAgUBNYeOuiqK7IlOjMLFAQF8SgP+J2DMkcHmKSy6SCFJ9xHKBMf/kLuUXI06 YztJ1EmfvWIF8Uanzj1UgD+95b8DHoKdFqytrsLDkfUKImrmhP6qxW8FRh1gBili 8ia85+6GZ/sO0ZTikKpWp6eybmGMxNA7aVYO+yyXrTvMuqrNjL7Vh1FcdIX2HoqP jVRUbEhmbuo= =f+uG -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
