> Mmm, why don't you just ask Bruce to maintain this package and update it > appropriately?
www.uk.debian.org/~aj/ contains make scripts to do the job for hamm. i don't like this rude behaviour too, but it's the debian way to remove a package, and several people complaint to me, that the current situation isn't good. maybe we can find a way to put the new makefiles on ftp.debian.org or somewhere else ? i don't think that a package is the right place for such stuff : many people want to burn debian cd's before or without installing debian hamm. who is working on wwww.debian.org ? i would like to get on the web server : a link to the makefiles, a list of official cdrom ftp site, a tutorial to rsync, a link to a static rsync binary, and a request not to sell or burn debian hamm cd's before it it released, a statement that and why we not include non-free programs, my README for the current debian cd's (list what images exist, and why), a ruling for the "official" term etc. if possible, this should go first to some internal server, so that people can review it. andreas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
