I don't usually write to the list to say "me too", but I think that is a pretty foundamental step to be taken. I completely agree with Ian but "me too" I think the stable pool is a better approach (even if it requires more resources to be set up). Ciao,
> Maintainers have the final word only if the exercise it. We > don't need to stall a release because someone decided that > some real life issue was more important to them. > > > This is still a major operation at every freeze time. I like the > > "stable pool" approach much better. That way we are ready to release > > *at any time*, modulo newly discovered bugs in the stable packages > > that have to be fixed. > > I think I also like the "stable pool" approach better. --*********************************************************************** * Federico DI Gregorio ** GCS/S/>L d- s:>:+ a26 C++ UL++ P+++ L*+++>$ D * * <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ** W+>++ N+ o? !K w--->!$ O M- V-- PS+(+++) PE(--) * Debian Developer ** Y+(-)(+)(-)... PGP+ s+ 5- X+++ R*<+(+++) b+++ * * ** DI++ D---- G- e+++>++++ h--- r++ z++ * ************************************************************************* -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
