Manoj Srivastava writes: > Hi, > While we are talking about obsolete packages, what is the > story on these? I mean, I would not like to just remove all the > picons packages (why are they marked obsolete)? What about ckermit? > How many of these are actually obsolete, and how many just have been > yanked from hamm? > > --- Obsolete and local packages present on system --- > *** interpre Opt blt2 2.1-6 <none>
there exists a blt version, based on blt2.1, which is compatible with tcl8.0/tk8.0; I packaged it last week and uploaded it to unstable. Or should this go to frozen as well (blt8.0-unoff, blt8.0-unoff-dev)? > *** libs Opt gstep-base0 0.2.12-2 <none> obsolete. gstep-base is the new package. > *** libs Opt libtclobjc1 1.1b6-1 <none> I'll look at this and upload it, if the current egcs/gcc objc runtimes are still compatible. > *** x11 Opt tkdesk 1.0b4-2.1 <none> this package could use blt8.0-unoff -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
