--On Mon, May 4, 1998 6:38 am -0700 "Joel Klecker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At 12:24 +0100 1998-05-04, Jules Bean wrote: >>The following packages on my system are in bo but not in hamm: >> >> --- Obsolete and local packages present on system --- >> ----- Obsolete/local Required packages ----- >> ------- Obsolete/local Required packages in section base ------- >> *** Req base timezone 7.55-2 <none> >> ----- Obsolete/local Standard packages ----- >> ------- Obsolete/local Standard packages in section admin ------- >> *** Std admin wg15-locale 2-5 <none> >> ------- Obsolete/local Standard packages in section libs ------- >> *** Std libs libbfd2.7.0. 2.7.0.9-3 <none> > > Those packages are a) superceded (the first two) or b) obsolete (the last). > Cool. I'll kill them. Should the first two have been "Replaces: "'ed by their successors? And do we perhaps need a way of marking a package as Obsolete - Default action purge - in the packages file? Jules /----------------+-------------------------------+---------------------\ | Jelibean aka | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | 6 Evelyn Rd | | Jules aka | | Richmond, Surrey | | Julian Bean | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | TW9 2TF *UK* | +----------------+-------------------------------+---------------------+ | War doesn't demonstrate who's right... just who's left. | | When privacy is outlawed... only the outlaws have privacy. | \----------------------------------------------------------------------/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
