Christian Schwarz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> Just go get this right: As Policy Manager I have fiat power WRT policy
> decisions. (This was stated by Bruce when I was nomiated and repeated by
> Ian J. on 8 Dec 97--check out debian-private if you have doubts.) 
> 
> As I wrote to debian-policy a few months ago, section 2.3.2 of the Policy
> Manual _is_ official policy. There is a currently a discussion on
> debian-policy about this section--but until we have a result from the
> discussion, this section applies _as_ _is_. 

What's the problem with this? We already have the 'Debian QA group' as a
'maintainer' for some packages, so why not a 'Debian PGP group' as another
maintainer?

        Martin.


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to