Christian Schwarz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Just go get this right: As Policy Manager I have fiat power WRT policy > decisions. (This was stated by Bruce when I was nomiated and repeated by > Ian J. on 8 Dec 97--check out debian-private if you have doubts.) > > As I wrote to debian-policy a few months ago, section 2.3.2 of the Policy > Manual _is_ official policy. There is a currently a discussion on > debian-policy about this section--but until we have a result from the > discussion, this section applies _as_ _is_.
What's the problem with this? We already have the 'Debian QA group' as a 'maintainer' for some packages, so why not a 'Debian PGP group' as another maintainer? Martin. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]