Hello, Simon Josefsson [15/Jan 3:58pm +01] wrote: > Lucas Nussbaum <[email protected]> writes: > >> On 13/01/26 at 00:08 -0800, Otto Kekäläinen wrote: >>> > 50.000+ packages used to be a lot to maintain in a single version >>> > control repository. By todays standard, it isn't. I suspect if you >>> > take all of Deabin's debian/ source directories and put them in a single >>> > git repository, it would not be that much larger than say Guix, >>> > Homebrew, NixOS, Fedora or some other more centralized packaging system. >>> >>> Yes, Debian could have a monorepo where each subdirectory is a source >>> package name, and the contents is the equivalent of debian/ currently. >> >> It's already happening at the team level, with >> https://salsa.debian.org/rust-team/debcargo-conf.git (3187 packages) >> or >> https://salsa.debian.org/haskell-team/DHG_packages.git (1075 packages) > > Wow! > > Can that be combined with tag2upload?
Not at present: #969925. > Would things just work if git-deborig were teached to fetch upstream git > through debian/upstream/metadata? > > Then I suppose even baredebian repositories would work, without any > 'upstream' branch, which I find like an interesting concept to explore. That might be interesting independent of monorepos. -- Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
