Hi, Ansgar 🙀 <[email protected]> writes:
> The Dgit folks want to make the complete Git repository, including the > non-free artifacts, the "source", thus disregarding the social contract > in its current form. I think it's really unhelpful to throw around accusations like that. Even if you think the consequence of what they're doing is in conflict with the social contract, it's highly unlikely that the dgit folk see it the same way. You could have said "I think making the entire git repository the 'source' even where it includes non-free artifacts conflicts with our social contract." which would have pointed out the conflict you think is present without accusing other DDs of deliberately disregarding the social contract. Regards, Matthew -- "At least you know where you are with Microsoft." "True. I just wish I'd brought a paddle." http://www.debian.org
