On 09/05/25 at 10:27 +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: > > However, I have doubts about (4), since there's still so many different > > workflows to use Git+Salsa. > > Which brings us back to DEP-14 as a baseline recommendation that can > help reduce friction. While individual workflows vary, having some > repository is a precondition for any collaboration--and DEP-14 provides a > neutral, widely accepted starting point.
Err, the current state of things is that DEP-14 is still in CANDIDATE state, and I read the last thread on this topic as unconclusive[0]. [0] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2025/01/msg00080.html So I wouldn't say that is "widely accepted". I would love to see data about the actual acceptance of DEP-14 among packages in the archive: my feeling is that it is currently being a bit ignored by maintainers and teams (but maybe I'm wrong). Lucas
