On May 8, 2025 04:27, Jonas Smedegaard <jo...@jones.dk> wrote:
> What do you want those numbers to tell us? That there is nothing > invasive about your experimental method and therefore no need to invent > new acronyms because NMU is a perfectly fine descriptor, or that your > method has show efficiency or that the victims (a.k.a. lucky targets of > your merciful attention) were statistically happy with your coercion, > or...? I found this paragraph very much out of line. Have you conaidered that maybe the "victims" may in fact very much appreciate the help that is offered? It is with this kind of very unwanted attitude that we keep harmful strong package ownership in Debian. I support Andreas work, and anyone attempting NMU, espcially considering this hostile atmosphere maintained by a small minority of us. Thomas Goirand (zigo)
