[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Raul Miller)  wrote on 26.04.98 in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > I don't like the idea of making dpkg itself yet more complicated.

Kai Henningsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think that's the only acceptable way, though (as long as we take dpkg to  
> mean dpkg_*.deb).

I was taking dpkg to be the program named dpkg and was suggesting that
this functionality remain outside that program.  Of course, putting the
utility into the dpkg suite is a good (essential) idea.

-- 
Raul


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to