Hi All, According to https://udd.debian.org/patches.cgi?src=lazarus&version=3.8%2Bdfsg1-4 my package have a patch with invalid metadata. There seem to be that the tool considers the following as an error: Forwarded: Yes Bug-Upstream: https://gitlab.com/freepascal.org/lazarus/lazarus/-/issues/41378
This is despite that https://dep-team.pages.debian.net/deps/dep3/, which is given as a hint by the tool, states clearly that: > * Forwarded (optional)Any value other than "no" or "not-needed" means that the > patch has been forwarded upstream. Ideally the value is an URL proving that > it has been forwarded and where one can find more information about its > inclusion status.If the field is missing, its implicit value is "yes" if the > "Bug" field is present, otherwise it's "no". The field is really required > only if the patch is vendor specific, in that case its value should be "not- > needed" to indicate that the patch must not be forwarded upstream (whereas > "no" simply means that it has not yet been done). So the natural value "yes" is considered as an error, just because the (not so) ideal value is not used. Without arguing too much why using "Forwarded" followed by "Bug-upstream" is much better than the ideal proposed value, I consider that the check tool implementation is wrong. However I would like to hear from others what do they think before asking to relax the check. -- Cheers, Abou Al Montacir
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
