On Tue, Jan 28, 2025 at 12:50:43PM +0100, Guillem Jover wrote: > > I'd point out that "debian/main" also refers to the part of the Debian > > package archive that is not "contrib" or "non-free". > > I therefore perceive "debian/main" as ambiguous. > I think this has been mentioned in the past, and I understand this could > be considered confusing depending on the context. But I think that in > this specific context this looks a bit like a stretch, because using > this naming to refer to an archive area without also qualifying it in > addition with a specific suite/codename does not make much sense to me, > also when in particular the main archive area is implicit in most (if > not all) of the maintainer side of the packaging. So in context, to me > it seems clear it should be referring to the main development branch > for Debian. :)
I agree with Guillem here. I also like debian/devel btw...
--
cheers,
Holger
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ holger@(debian|reproducible-builds|layer-acht).org
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ OpenPGP: B8BF54137B09D35CF026FE9D 091AB856069AAA1C
⠈⠳⣄
Ich bin so alt, ich hab im Kindergarten noch Aschenbecher getöpfert.
(@joanalistin)
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
