On Sun, Jan 26, 2025 at 11:07:12AM +0000, Ahmad Khalifa wrote:
> > The error description seems straightforward.  But how does one solve
> > this?  I have to assume that the linker would by default link with the
> > libc (?), so perhaps the linker invocation has options that suppress
> > this?  What would that be?
> 
> You may not need to solve it if it's intentional.
> For example, you have a "plugin" style library that only uses functions from
> the main library and nothing else.

Yes.


> I do this to confirm if lintian is correct:
> > $ objdump -p file.so
> >   ...
> >   NEEDED               libc.so.6
> >   ...

No?
Lintian already says there is no "NEEDED               libc.so.6", the
question is whether that is an error or not.


-- 
WBR, wRAR

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to