Julien Plissonneau Duquène <sre4e...@free.fr> writes: > Le 2025-01-24 09:37, Gioele Barabucci a écrit : >> Even if we were to keep "master" instead of "latest", it's much better to use >> "upstream/master" and "debian/master": no name clashes and no ambiguity about >> which "master" one is referring to. > > Or maybe `debian/main` to keep up with the popular trend, and as `main` is a > better choice anyways, regardless of some popular controversial arguments.
Indeed. I don't really understand what "latest" is meant to convey. Latest what? "Latest work ever done on this package at any given moment"? We surely don't want to discourage branches with specific topics that surely can hold later work?
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
