Folks,

Recently a discussion on -devel branched into the topic of the Debian
Wiki (the particular sub-topic was the wish from some to have a git-backed wiki). Some felt that this discussion should be moved off -devel, and others pointed out that the Wiki maintainers themselves should be made aware, and that debian-www@ was the correct place for
that.

Discussions/desires to enhance or evolve the Wiki are nothing new, and
previous discussions exist in many other places¹. Debian being Debian,
that will always be the case. And rather than try to stamp out discussion in the "wrong" place, it seems to me a better approach might be to try and summarize the varied discussions, desires, requirements and proposals: and the Wiki itself is a good place for that, IMHO.

To that end, I've created DebianWiki/NextGen, and made an initial attempt to summarize the current live threads I'm aware of: <https://wiki.debian.org/DebianWiki/NextGen>. I'll try to update it, and contributions are welcome.

I'm sending this (primarily) to debian-www@ as that's the right place for Wiki discussions, by convention, and to be sure the Wiki maintainers see it.

And so on to my 2p's worth: A lot of the discussion I've seen focussed on (a) narrow list of problems (moin 1.9.x, Python 2), (b) advocates solutions (e.g. mediawiki) and (c) makes assumptions (we must migrate all the content in perfect fidelity if we move wiki engine) which might not hold. I feel we should spend some time thinking hard about what we want from the Debian Wiki, i.e., a good old-fashioned requirements analysis, before we look at (b) or (c).

I'm particularly keen that the Wiki maintainers are in the loop (hence this mail), but also the current set of active wiki contributors.


[1] <https://salsa.debian.org/debian/grow-your-ideas/-/issues/2>

--
Please do not CC me for listmail.

👱🏻  Jonathan Dowland
✎  j...@debian.org
🔗  https://jmtd.net

Reply via email to