Niels Thykier <ni...@thykier.net> writes: > # The bug template used > > Severity: important > User: ni...@thykier.net > Usertags: rrr-no-as-default-issue > > Dear maintainer, > > During a test rebuild for building packages "Rules-Requires-Root: no" as ^ minor point, but adding "with" here would make it easier to follow
- [MBF]: Proposing `Rules-Requires-Root: no` being the new ... Niels Thykier
- Re: [MBF]: Proposing `Rules-Requires-Root: no` being... Santiago Vila
- Re: [MBF]: Proposing `Rules-Requires-Root: no` b... Niels Thykier
- Re: [MBF]: Proposing `Rules-Requires-Root: no` being... Antonio Terceiro
- Re: [MBF]: Proposing `Rules-Requires-Root: no` being... Wookey
- Re: [MBF]: Proposing `Rules-Requires-Root: no` being... Richard Lewis
- Re: [MBF]: Proposing `Rules-Requires-Root: no` being... Michael Biebl
- Re: [MBF]: Proposing `Rules-Requires-Root: no` b... Niels Thykier
- Re: [MBF]: Proposing `Rules-Requires-Root: no` b... Niels Thykier
- Status: `Rules-Requires-Root: no` being the new defa... Niels Thykier
- Status: `Rules-Requires-Root: no` being the new ... Niels Thykier
- `Rules-Requires-Root: no` to be the new default ... Niels Thykier