Otto Kekäläinen <o...@debian.org> writes: > Hi all, > > I am the kind of person that gets hugely annoyed by things like this. > Is anyone else feeling it? > > Can we agree on calling Debian Enhancement Proposals DEP-N with a dash? > > My eyes get sore when looking at commit messages like these: > > * cd4d154 DEP 15: initial draft > * f54478c DEP8: Fix link to current specification > * 1f20e9d DEP-14: Version -> refname mangling: Escape dots > > As the original DEP-0 used that in the title, I suggest we agree to > consistently spell it with a dash going forward. Anyone seconds?
I don't see "DEP-0" used in DEP 0? It uses "DEP: 0", "DEP0" and "DEP 0" but no occurance of DEP-0. Could you propose a DEP -1 to establish a recommended naming procedure? Including how to escape negative numbers in the shortened form, for which I suggest using DEP--1 to avoid confusion with DEP-1. :) /Simon
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
