On Sun, Aug 25, 2024 at 11:14 PM Chris Hofstaedtler <z...@debian.org> wrote: > Yeah, I agree. Do you want to upload a new src:fuse package dropping > the fuse binary package? > fuse3 already Provides: fuse, so that should be fine. The question is, how many dependent packages use the binaries from the fuse package or just depend on it. Sure, fuse3 provides fuse but the names of the binaries are different. For example scripts need to update fusermount call to fusermount3 call. As such, it might be better to ping maintainers of those packages about dropping the fuse binary for testing their packages first. Then after a month actually drop it. I was informed that debian-edu and grub-mount-udeb still use fuse-udeb, but in Trixie packages I don't see that anymore. I can drop that as well in a month. How do these sound there?
Cheers, Laszlo/GCS
