Hi,
Am Fri, Aug 16, 2024 at 11:09:58AM +0200 schrieb Andrea Pappacoda:
>
> In #829444 it has been proposed the addition of a new "layout" option to
> gbp.conf, which would tell git-buildpackage which layout to follow,
> allowing for a graceful migration.
>
> I've been thinking about a different approach though. What about adding
> a warning to git-buildpackage when `debian-branch` and `upstream-branch`
> are not set in gbp.conf? Compared to the `layout` option, it would have
> the following benefits:
> ...
> How does it sound to you? Am I missing something?
I prefer having no debian/gbp.conf at all in case the repository layout
would fit team policy. So the question is whether git-buildpackage can
cope with the old
master + upstream + pristine-tar
as well as
debian/latest + upstream/latest + pristine-tar
if no gbp.conf exists.
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
https://fam-tille.de
