Hi, Quoting Otto Kekäläinen (2024-08-02 17:23:51) > I agree that Salsa is sometimes a bit sluggish > (https://salsa.debian.org/salsa/support/-/issues/395),
what kind of hardware do you have? For people like me who are on slower hardware, the web experience is absolutely not funny and "a bit sluggish" doesn't begin to describe it. It is hard to find any other website I'm visiting that is slower than gitlab. For example, when I run this on my Firefox I get a score of 1.53: https://browserbench.org/Speedometer3.0/#summary On an intel core i7 1280P you will get around 7. If the result on your machine is towards the latter instead of the former, then I understand how you would describe the gitlab experience only as "a bit sluggish" instead of "atrocious". > but I hope we can do something to improve it and it is now a permanent reason > to not use Salsa. You now said "I hope we can do something to improve it and it is now a permanent reason to not use Salsa." twice: https://lists.debian.org/caou6tadwmnc__rvqpob7a1+zyysngotfiq4i+69hhpatfxe...@mail.gmail.com Did you typo it twice or do you actually mean that it's now a permanent reason to not use salsa? I am not suggesting salsa use because I think it's the best thing since the invention of sliced bread. But personally, I rather use something suboptimal if it means that we can more or less agree on a "default" and I think that the current situation (submission of patches by mail and the debian archive is the bts) is deterring to newcomers. I know that most people probably have faster machines than I. As it was pointed out elsewhere in this thread, Debian work already implies a lot more waiting than "a few seconds" for salsa to finish loading a page or finish yet another animation, so meh. With the glab tool I think I can be happy enough. Thanks! cheers, josch
signature.asc
Description: signature
