su 7. heinäk. 2024 klo 16.56 Daniel Gröber (d...@darkboxed.org) kirjoitti: > For me the reason to work on ifupdown-ng is that it has a better core > design, clean&modern code, an active upstream community, a ***test suite*** > and the potential to fully replace ifupdown without breaking anyone's > system doing it. Full compatibility is not there yet. I'm working on it, > see [1] but I'm optimistic so far. > > [1]: https://github.com/ifupdown-ng/ifupdown-ng/issues/247
I just had a look at ifupdown-ng. The /etc/network/interface syntax is not a drop-in replacement for ifupdown. That's a big no-no. Those "use dhcp" have to go. Martin-Éric
