Stefano Rivera <stefa...@debian.org> writes: > On the other hand, dgit is only useful if you have a certain view of the > world, that hasn't aligned with how I've done Debian packaging. I mean, > an entirely git-centric view where you let go of trying to maintain your > patch stack.
dgit has no problems with you maintaining your patch stack, at least as I understand that statement. I personally use the dgit-maint-debrebase(7) workflow, which is a fancy way of maintaining your patch stack using an equivalent of git rebase, since I love git rebase and use it all the time. But I used the dgit-maint-gbp(7) workflow, which is basically just the normal git-buildpackage workflow, for years and still use it for some of my packages and it works fine. Maybe you mean something different by this than I think you meant. -- Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org) <https://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>
