On Wed, May 17, 2023 at 01:45:10PM +0800, YunQiang Su wrote:
> For mipsel, we have one more thing to do:
>     - NaN2008 vs NaN legacy
> So I'd prefer rebootstrap (only for mipsel).
> And In fact we did it: https://repo.oss.cipunited.com/debian/

Thanks for the info.  What is the plan for landing the rebootstrapping in
the Debian archive?

The library package name change would happen across all architectures in
unstable.  Since the old library names will only exist in stable releases
prior to the rebootstrap, and thus have different ABIs, I think it makes
sense to have the same handling for mipsel as for other 32-bit archs wrt
compatibility provides; do you agree?

-- 
Steve Langasek                   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer                   to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developer                                   https://www.debian.org/
slanga...@ubuntu.com                                     vor...@debian.org

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to