On Wed, May 17, 2023 at 01:45:10PM +0800, YunQiang Su wrote: > For mipsel, we have one more thing to do: > - NaN2008 vs NaN legacy > So I'd prefer rebootstrap (only for mipsel). > And In fact we did it: https://repo.oss.cipunited.com/debian/
Thanks for the info. What is the plan for landing the rebootstrapping in the Debian archive? The library package name change would happen across all architectures in unstable. Since the old library names will only exist in stable releases prior to the rebootstrap, and thus have different ABIs, I think it makes sense to have the same handling for mipsel as for other 32-bit archs wrt compatibility provides; do you agree? -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. Ubuntu Developer https://www.debian.org/ slanga...@ubuntu.com vor...@debian.org
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature