>>>>> "Russ" == Russ Allbery <r...@debian.org> writes:
Russ> I agree with this option split, but that reminds me of a
Russ> different procedural note.
Russ> While I recognize and respect the desire to create a
Russ> comprehensive ballot, I'm still going to advocate for
Russ> proposing a GR only with the options that the person proposing
Russ> the GR would vote above NOTA, and possibly only your preferred
Russ> options.
I agree with Russ in this instance, which may b surprising to some given
how I approached the systemd GR.
I think that we will likely find people to sponsor something close to
all of Steve's options.
And I think that allowing those people to craft the wording of those
options will give them the best chance of winning.
Russ> (That said, I think there's a big exception, which is that if
Russ> you've canvassed a bunch of people who may not want to try to
Russ> craft their own ballot options, and developed options to
Russ> reflect their views, I think that's a fine approach and a good
Russ> reason to propose options that aren't your personal
Russ> preference.)
I also agree with this exception.
