Hi, On 15/03/22 at 09:29 -0700, Sean Whitton wrote: > > What the are the packages for which you are surprised that bugs were > > filed? I wonder which part of the criteria was too loose. > > It looks like the query didn't do quite what was intended, indeed: > src:userv-utils is maintained in git but a bug was filed. Before I go > ahead and close the bug, would you mind confirming this was an error > rather than a disagreement about what counts as VCS-maintained?
Taking src:userv-utils: - it is not maintained by Debian X - it is maintained in a VCS - the VCS is OK - there are no direct changes in diff.gz, because there's no diff.gz, because the package is a native package. => the filter evaluates to true So the limit of the query above is that it does not indeed account for So the query works as intended, but indeed does not properly take into account native packages, since direct_changes is always false. There are 16 packages in that case: - with a Debian revision: cachefilesd userv-utils vde2 - without a Debian revision: daptup dgit games-thumbnails gimp-plugin-registry gitpkg ifupdown-extra lpr postal svn-buildpackage uphpmvault vim-scripts whalebuilder xmorph Indeed, it would have been better to look at whether those packages include a Debian revision, to deal separately with those three special cases. Lucas
