On Wed, Feb 09, 2022 at 06:53:49PM +0100, Enrico Zini wrote: > > > I've added "We should have a default standard packaging workflow": > > > https://salsa.debian.org/debian/grow-your-ideas/-/issues/24 > > This should include ideas what to do with resignations that will follow. > > Why would one decide to resign based on a standard for a default that > nobody is required to follow? > > I'm talking about suggesting a widely accepted default for people who > would love to have a widely accepted default suggested instead of > needing to figuring out a workflow from lots of conflicting tutorials. > > I'm not talking about mandating the way everyone has to do their work in > Debian. Eh, if it's just for new people who don't know which workflow to use then fine, it's a good idea, but the scope of that is quite narrow and doesn't even help the second point in "This impacts" ("every package I need to change is set up in a different way!").
-- WBR, wRAR
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
