On 2/5/20 7:36 PM, Paul Wise wrote: > AFAICT from Debian's FHS > documentation, since /srv is laid out differently on different hosts > packages should not rely on a particular layout. My interpretation is > of this is that packages should never touch /srv unless directed to do > so by the sysadmin.
That's been my interpretation too. My expectation as a sysadmin is that /srv is available for my _exclusive_ use. > FTP servers that default to using /srv/ftp to serve files. > TFTP servers that default to using /srv/tftp to serve files. > These also use those dirs as user home directories. I actually use both /srv/ftp and /srv/tftp, but I still don't think those are acceptable defaults. > I wonder if any of these should be changed? FWIW, I would say yes. -- Richard
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
