Hi all, In [1] there are several packages that reference /srv in their maintainer scripts or debconf prompts. AFAICT from Debian's FHS documentation, since /srv is laid out differently on different hosts packages should not rely on a particular layout. My interpretation is of this is that packages should never touch /srv unless directed to do so by the sysadmin.
The packages seem to come in these categories: Only referencing /srv in debconf messages. FTP servers that default to using /srv/ftp to serve files. TFTP servers that default to using /srv/tftp to serve files. These also use those dirs as user home directories. OBS uses /srv/obs for various things. I wonder if any of these should be changed? 1. https://binarycontrol.debian.net/?q=%2Fsrv&path= 2. https://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/fhs/fhs-3.0.html#srvDataForServicesProvidedBySystem -- bye, pabs https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
